Topic 17 of 76 · Outcome measures
Life-Years Gained (LYG)
Life-years gained is the additional survival attributable to an intervention, with no quality adjustment: the area between the survival curves with and without it. The equal-value life year gained (evLYG) is a modern variant that credits all life extension equally.
Why it matters
LYG is the rawest health outcome: how much longer do people live? It matters when quality data is missing, when comparing against QALY-skeptical audiences, and in oncology where survival curves are the primary trial output. The evLYG (used by the US ICER institute alongside cost/QALY) exists for an ethical reason: QALYs value a year of extended life by the patient's utility, so extending the life of someone with a disability "counts less" — evLYG values every extended year at a fixed utility, removing that discrimination.
The math
LYG = mean survival_new − mean survival_comparator
= area between survival curves (restricted to the time horizon)
QALY view of life extension: extension × patient utility
evLYG view of life extension: extension × fixed utility (ICER uses ~0.851,
the average US population utility)
Both are discounted in economic models.
Worked example
A sepsis early-warning algorithm in a hospital: modeling shows earlier antibiotics prevent 12 deaths/year; average age of those patients gives 8 remaining life-years each at utility 0.7.
LYG = 12 × 8 = 96 life-years/year
QALYs = 96 × 0.7 = 67.2
evLYG = 96 × 0.851 = 81.7
At £20,000 per QALY, the QALY framing values the survival at £1.34M/year; the evLYG framing at £1.63M. The gap is exactly the ethical judgment about whether a life-year at utility 0.7 is worth 70% of a "full" one. Serious dossiers report both.
Software engineering connection
- Survival analysis is the shared toolkit: Kaplan-Meier curves for patients and for services (time-to-failure, time-to-churn) are the same math. "Service-years gained" from a reliability investment = area between the with/without survival curves of the system — a more honest framing than point MTTF claims.
- The evLYG carries a metric-design warning for engineering too: any productivity metric that weights output by a "quality of team" factor will systematically undervalue improvements for constrained or struggling teams — sometimes you want the equal-value variant on purpose.
Pitfalls
- Median vs mean survival: economic models need mean (area under curve); trials often headline median. They differ a lot in skewed distributions.
- Extrapolation beyond trial follow-up dominates modeled LYG in chronic disease — state the extrapolation model and test it in sensitivity analysis.
- Claiming deaths prevented from observational before/after data without adjusting for case mix and secular trends.
Sources
- York Health Economics Consortium glossary: life-years gained. https://yhec.co.uk/glossary/life-years-gained/
- ICER, "Cost-Effectiveness, the QALY, and the evLYG." https://icer.org/our-approach/methods-process/cost-effectiveness-the-qaly-and-the-evlyg/